Sunderland fans react to Adam Johnson trial

Adam Johnson had it all, a dream job, more money than he could ever spend and a loving family. Now he is facing a lengthy jail term for his crimes against a 15 year-old girl.

After breaking into the Middlesborough team at the age of 16, he was tipped to have a very promising career. His fall from grace now means that he is potentially facing up to 10 years in prison, with the trial judge saying: “The defendant must understand there is a very high probability of a significant custodial sentence.”

During his trial, details emerged that Adam Johnson had met with Margaret Byrne, CEO of Sunderland AFC on 4 May 2015 in which he admitted that he had kissed and exchanged messages with a 15-year-old girl.

In a statement released by the club on Wednesday, Sunderland made no reference to Johnson’s alleged admissions to Ms Byrne.

The statement said: “Had the club known that Mr Johnson intended to plead guilty to any of these charges then his employment would have been terminated immediately.”

The opinion among fans in Sunderland is that they believe the club did not know the extent of Adam Johnson’s crimes but if they did, the anger towards the club could certainly be justified.

Full Statement from Sunderland AFC:

To respect the legal process, Sunderland AFC was unable to comment on this case until after the jury had delivered its verdict. It has now done so and we thank our supporters for their patience and understanding. We now wish to clarify certain matters which arose during the trial.

Mr. Johnson was suspended by the club immediately following his arrest on March 2, 2015. At that time, the club was advised by police of the broad nature of the allegations against Mr. Johnson, who was being advised at all times by his own legal team. The club felt that the decision to suspend was appropriate at that time, even though he had not then been charged with any offence. Two weeks later, his suspension was lifted after a meeting between the club and the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA), and after the club took independent legal advice.  The club reached this decision only after carrying out a safeguarding assessment and liaising with relevant agencies.

On 23 April 2015, Mr. Johnson was charged with four offences.  The club was informed that it was Mr. Johnson’s intention to defend all the charges, a stance he maintained right up until the first day of trial.  The club continued to review the safeguarding procedures it had put in place throughout this time.

On 4 May 2015, an introductory meeting took place between Mr. Johnson, his father and Orlando Pownall QC.  Mr. Pownall had not previously met Mr.  Johnson. The club’s CEO was present during part of that meeting. During the time that she was present there was no suggestion whatsoever that Mr. Johnson would be changing his plea.  Some documents were received relating to the case, which were immediately sent to Mr. Pownall for his attention.  However, the club was not in a position to make any judgment on the outcome of the case nor on Mr. Johnson’s decision to defend all the allegations. Following that meeting, Mr. Johnson again confirmed to the club, presumably on advice from his own legal team, that his intention was to defend the charges in their entirety and he was confident of success once all evidence had been considered. He subsequently entered not guilty pleas to all charges on 6 June 2015.

The club did not give evidence either for the prosecution or the defence in this case. It was therefore not present in court when it is understood that a suggestion was made that the club knew all along that Mr. Johnson was intending to change his plea just before trial to enable him to continue to play football for the club and that the club may also have been involved in tactical discussions about the plea. This is utterly without foundation and is refuted in the strongest possible terms.  The club never placed any pressure or demands on Mr. Johnson to play football during this process. Decisions in relation to the pleas and the conduct of the trial have been left entirely to Mr. Johnson and his highly experienced and skilled legal team. Mr. Johnson has admitted in evidence that he changed his plea “on legal advice”.

The club only became aware of the change of plea, in relation to two of the four counts on the indictment, on the first day of the trial, after hearing it reported through the media.  The club was not advised in advance that Mr. Johnson would plead guilty to any offence.  Had the club known that Mr. Johnson intended to plead guilty to any of these charges, then his employment would have been terminated immediately.  Indeed, upon learning of the guilty plea on 11 February 2016, the club acted quickly and decisively in terminating Adam Johnson’s contract without notice.

This has been an extremely difficult time for all involved. The victim and her family have endured an unimaginable ordeal in the last 12 months and we trust that they will now be allowed to move on with their lives without further intrusion or public scrutiny.

Following the announcement of today’s verdict and the release of this detailed statement, the club intends to make no further comment.


Comments are closed.